Timeline for answer to No, I do not believe this is the end by Lyndon Gingerich
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22 at 18:52 | comment | added | Lyndon Gingerich | In my opinion, the maximal profit comes from cutting losses, handing management to the mods, and allowing SE to operate hands-off. If Prosus spends money on changes for growth, I don't think they'll get it back; SE already has everything its users want. A small positive figure beats a negative one. | |
| Jan 22 at 18:39 | comment | added | Lyndon Gingerich | @AlexGeorg SO makes enough now to keep the servers up, right? Justifying the two billion dollars is harder. Maybe sue the AI companies for failing to attribute cited code as required by the Creative Commons license? | |
| Jan 22 at 15:14 | comment | added | AlexGeorg | How do you propose to finance the servers and make the site a meaningful business proposition with this mass of knowledge? The most willing buyer would have been the AI companies, but they already have the data unfortunately... | |
| Jan 21 at 19:28 | comment | added | rjzii | All problems eventually come back to first principles - that's a bingo! That's something that was even mentioned on one of the podcases back in '08 and why there was discussing capturing the "long tail" of programming problems. | |
| Jan 20 at 23:34 | history | answered | Lyndon Gingerich | CC BY-SA 4.0 |